1.5T MRI Spreads Its Wings

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
e-mail icon
Google icon
Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging Centers (SDMI) in Las Vegas uses Vantage powered by Atlas 1.5T from Toshiba America Medical Systems.

While manufacturers work on improving 3 Tesla MRI scanning to the point that it is a financially viable modality for more facilities, 1.5T is serving as an imaging workhorse. Recent studies have shown that breast MRI routinely finds previously undetected lesions and the speed and comfort of the scanners makes 1.5T MRI ideal for numerous applications.

When technologist John Byrd began his career in 1985, there were fewer than 100 MRI systems in the world. The standard exam took an hour-and-a-half to complete. The computers were the size of most living rooms. Five patients a day was the maximum the equipment could handle. “Now I do five patients before my morning break,” he says. The computers fit under a desk and exams take about 20 minutes. “The thought of a heart MRI scan back then was unthinkable. The imagination of the engineers just amazes me.”

Byrd uses Magnetom Symphony scanners from Siemens Medical Solutions which he describes as “probably the most balanced systems to do the widest variety of imaging that there is.” He also finds the equipment easy to use because the coils are integrated into the tabletop, so “it’s easier to change out the equipment. You can do multiple exams without having to get the patient up off the table. That makes a difference when you have a high-volume workload.” He’s also found the accompanying Siemens syngo software to be pretty intuitive and easy to pickup.

Biting back at breast cancer

Paul Mimmis, MD, a radiologist at St. Francis Hospitals and Health System in Indianapolis, works with two open-sided 1.5T scanners from GE Healthcare—the Signa HDe and HDX—and another three scanners at offsite campuses. He particularly appreciates that the compact equipment from GE’s newest line doesn’t require a computer room and cooling equipment. That saved the organization $50,000 to $80,000 in installation costs.

Mimmis says 1.5T MRI has made important advances to breast imaging. “I can’t emphasize enough the difference we’ve made with breast MRI,” he says. “Now, pretty much every [breast cancer] patient gets a breast MRI before surgery and one in three patients has more than one lesion in the same breast that we didn’t know about. Another 1 in 20 have a lesion in the other breast.”

If those findings are detected before surgery, clinicians can change the patient’s course of care and hopefully pave the way to a higher cure rate. “Now, we can add a contrast injection and detect cancer much sooner than we can from ultrasound or mammography.” Mimmis is excited to be making a difference and playing a major role in the blitz on breast cancer. “We’re making a difference in people’s lives and that makes a lot of people around here pretty happy about what they’re doing,” he adds.

Mimmis also uses GE’s Vibrant for breast imaging. The patent-pending software provides rapid imaging without compromising in-plane resolution. The ability to scan very quickly and look at chemical abnormalities in an area help determine whether something suspicious is scar tissue or a new tumor.

 Unfortunately, Mimmis says he sees a lot of sites not doing 1.5T MRI for breast imaging because they are not ready for the technology. “The more people we can get scanning breast MRI at 1.5T, the better.” To that end, he says he and his colleagues are always willing to help other hospitals and clinics set up and learn the equipment if they express an interest.

Prime for patients

1.5T MRI is the industry standard, and is quieter and less claustrophobic for patients, says Mark Winkler, MD, radiologist at Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging Centers (SDMI), a five-site imaging operation in Las Vegas. “1.5T is a mature and proven technology that we can use for all applications.” SDMI images about 800 patients a week with MRI and uses Vantage powered by Atlas 1.5T from Toshiba America Medical Systems.

3T has garnered a fair amount of industry buzz, but Winkler says it is more of a research tool. “It’s bigger and longer and very noisy—not a pleasant experience for the patient.” Plus, 3T is not as robust for all patient studies, particularly not for imaging moving structures. 

The rapid scanning 1.5T can deliver—20 minutes compared with closer to 45 minutes for traditional scanning—is helpful for most patients. It’s tough for patients to hold still, says Byrd. But a 20-minute scan has a better chance of producing