AIM: Same class of diabetes meds carry different risks of heart failure, death

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
e-mail icon
Google icon

Older adults who take the diabetes medication rosiglitazone (Avandia) appear to have a higher risk of death and heart failure than those taking the related medication pioglitazone (Actos), according to a study in the Nov. 24 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine.

In 1997, thiazolidinediones expanded the available options for diabetes treatment, offering decreased insulin resistance, better control of blood sugar and, for some patients, a delay in beginning insulin therapy, according to the study’s background information. Two agents in this class—rosiglitazone maleate and pioglitazone hydrochloride—were approved in 1999. However, a black-box warning soon was added to both drugs cautioning against their use in patients with existing heart failure.

Recent meta-analyses have suggested that the risks associated with Avandia from the London-based-GlaxoSmithKline may be higher than those associated with Actos from the Deerfield, Ill.-based Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

To compare cardiovascular outcomes and death rates between the two, Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer, MD, and colleagues at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, used medical claims data to study 28,361 patients older than 65 years who began taking either rosiglitazone or pioglitazone between 2000 and 2005.

Of these, 50.3 percent began treatment with pioglitazone and 49.7 percent with rosiglitazone, according to the researchers.

After an average of 380 days taking pioglitazone or 369 taking rosiglitazone, 1,869 patients died. After adjusting for other factors, individuals taking rosiglitazone had a 15 percent higher rate of death and a 13 percent greater risk of heart failure compared with those taking pioglitazone. However, the investigators said that there were no differences in heart attack or stroke risk between the two groups.

“This study confirms the safety concerns that have been raised for rosiglitazone compared with pioglitazone, which, in turn, also cannot be considered a very safe drug given its well-documented effect on the risk of congestive heart failure,” the authors wrote. “Although previous studies have indicated that the increased risk with rosiglitazone use resides predominantly in cardiovascular outcomes, the present study suggests that differences in all-cause mortality risk may be even more important to consider in elderly patients.”