Stroke: Specialized care, telemedicine may improve long-term stroke outcomes
Stroke patients have significantly better chances of surviving and living independently when they receive specialized stroke care in community hospitals that have telecommunication support from major stroke centers, according to a study published online Nov. 18 in Stroke.

At 12 and 30 months after stroke, patients treated at hospitals with specialized stroke units had a significantly lower rate of death and dependency than did patients who received care at hospitals without stroke units. Dependency was defined as disability or need for institutional care. The findings extend the benefits of specialized stroke care with telemedicine support initially observed three months after stroke.

“What we see is that not only does the quality of care improve very significantly, but also the subsequent prognosis of the patients,” said Heinrich Audebert, MD, a stroke specialist at Charite Hospital in Berlin. “These effects are also quite stable. We can see the effects after one and two years and, at least in our trial, after two and a half years.”

The authors wrote that the advent of telemedicine has provided an opportunity to expand the reach of specialized acute care services to virtually any hospital, regardless of location.

In the Telemedical Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS), a collaboration between two academic stroke centers and community hospitals in Bavaria, the researchers examined the feasibility and potential value of extending specialized stroke care to a large area of the Bavarian region of southeastern Germany. Components of the program included:
  • Establishing stroke units at the community hospitals, including forming multidisciplinary stroke teams to provide care;
  • Installing monitoring equipment and facilities;
  • Training and educating members of the stroke team, including continuous bedside teaching by specialist physicians, nurses and therapists;
  • Implementing standard treatment protocols; and
  • Telemedicine consultation provided for 24 hours by the academic stroke centers.
The researchers compared outcomes among stroke patients treated at five TEMPiS hospitals with patient outcomes at five non-TEMPiS hospitals in the same geographic region. The study included 3,060 stroke patients, 1,938 treated at TEMPiS hospitals and 1,122 treated at other hospitals. Initial results showed that specialized stroke care with telemedicine support led to better outcomes at three months, specifically a significantly lower rate of the composite endpoint of death and dependency.

The investigators said that the improvement was associated with practices indicative of high-quality stroke care: rapid brain imaging, the frequency with which patients received clot-dissolving drugs; the assessment of stroke-related swallowing disorders; and early initiation of stroke rehabilitation.

Audebert and colleagues reported on participants for 12 months and 30 months. Consistent with the three-month results, longer follow-up showed a statistically not significant trend towards a better outcome of the combined outcome of death and institutional care.

However, the authors wrote that patients treated at the TEMPiS hospitals had a statistically significant 35 percent lower probability of death and dependency at 12 months and almost a 20 percent reduced probability for this poor outcome at 30 months compared with non-TEMPiS patients.

Audebert said a hospital would have to invest about $130,000 to set up a specialized stroke unit, including construction and equipment costs. There are also additional costs for augmented nursing and therapist staff in the community hospitals and personal costs for quality management and teleconsultation service in the Stroke Centers. However, these costs are obviously recouped over time by savings related to shorter hospitalizations and less disability.

The German Federal Ministry of Research funded the study.