Robotic surgery, more accurately but less frequently termed computer-assisted surgery, is in its infancy, but it is beginning to demonstrate some benefits for patients, surgeons and hospitals. In an ideal application, robotically-assisted surgery allows for greater precision with less trauma and a faster recovery for the patient.
Surgeons at nearly 200 U.S. hospitals are attempting to determine the utility of robotic surgery with Intuitive Surgical's da Vinci robot, the only robot currently approved by the FDA. Since it gained FDA approval three years ago, surgeons across the country have been exploring procedures with the robot and attempting to define appropriate applications.
THE CLINICAL PICTURE
Robotics represents an entirely different way of doing surgery. At the same time, however, the robot is a surgical tool - not a surgeon. The robot and its instruments, rather than the surgeon, are adjacent to the patient. The surgeon sits at a console connected to the robot, where he views images and directs the procedure. The system translates movements of the surgeon's hands, wrists and fingers into real-time movement of surgical instruments.
Mark Granson, MD, chief of surgery at St. Luke's Hospital and Health Network (Bethlehem, Pa.), has been using the da Vinci robot for nearly three years and has completed a variety of surgeries with the robot, including lung resections, prostatectomies, gall bladder removals, adrenallectomies and gastric reflux and gynecological surgeries. He explains the benefits. "With the robot, we have an almost 3D view vs. a conventional laparoscopic 2D view. In addition to better imaging, we have a better ability to dissect because the robot functions with an articulated hand."
On the imaging side, the robot incorporates a 3D endoscope and image processing equipment for 3D images of the surgical field. The articulated wrist is a substantial improvement over the human hand as it provides 360-degree maneuverability. The combination often translates into smaller incisions; some procedures that require a four- to five-inch incision with conventional surgery can be completed with a less than one-inch incision with the robot.
While robots have been put to work in a variety of procedures, surgeons agree that their use should be limited to procedures where their use translates into benefits. Robert Ashton, MD, director of minimally invasive and robotic thoracic surgery at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center in New York City, explains, "There are no absolutes for the robot. Sometimes, we use it for the whole surgery and sometimes we use it for just a part of the surgery."
At St. Luke's Bethlehem, two primary uses are prostate and lung resections. Granson says robotically-assisted prostate resections result in less blood loss and less nerve loss than open surgery. This could correlate with better outcomes, shorter lengths of stay and reduced costs. Another procedure where the robot outperforms conventional surgery is a sternotomy. "The difference is night and day," confirms Ashton. Instead of a large 12-inch incision to open the chest, a robotically-assisted sternotomy consists of three small incisions with recovery time in the one to two week range vs. two months for the more invasive, conventional surgery.
Even when outcomes aren't improved, the robot may be the better option because it enables greater precision. Take a myotomy to cut the esophageal muscle and normalize swallowing for patients with achalasia. The conventional technique relies on a thoracotomy or laparoscopic. Ashton explains, "The robot allows us to be even more precise than we could laparoscopically."
Paul Curcillo, MD, vice chairman of surgery and director of robotics and minimally invasive surgery at Drexel University in Philadelphia, has been using the da Vinci robot since October 2002. He says, "The primary clinical benefit is that it lets us offer better minimally invasive surgeries." Today, surgeons at Drexel primarily deploy the robot in abdominal surgeries-urologic, kidney and prostate procedures-such as adrenallectomies and tumor debulkings. Although Curcillo and his colleagues started out using the robot for all types of procedures, the team has backed off and is using the robot where it makes most sense clinically. He explains, "We don't do gall bladders with the robot anymore. It costs more and takes more time with the robot. This is an example of a procedure that we can do quickly and easily with a laparoscope."