Value-based Imaging: CT, Care Protocols & Cutting Radiation Dose

Twitter icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
e-mail icon
Google icon
 - CT image management & informatics
Hospitals are leveraging advanced CT imaging in strategic ways to employ a value-based approach.
Source: Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center

Imaging, like all of healthcare, is in the midst of a drastic shift. Tried-and-true models based on volume will no longer suffice in the future. For decades, U.S. healthcare has outspent other nations, paying more than 141 percent of the average of other globalized economies. Yet, outcomes fail to reflect the investment; the U.S. trails globalized economies in terms of many health indicators, including life expectancy, which ranks a dismal 31st.

Demographics, politics and economics have merged, promising to re-invent the status quo. The aging population will translate into nearly 80 million new Medicare beneficiaries in the next 20 years. Meanwhile, healthcare reform spells increased demand, via another 32 million lives covered by 2019. And anticipated changes in physician payment mechanisms are expected to tie compensation to quality.

The change has rattled physicians and administrators across the country. But a few organizations are far ahead of the curve and have leveraged advanced CT imaging in strategic ways to employ a value-based approach, proving that the model can improve patient outcomes and save resources. Consider:

Stony Brook University Medical Center in New York has saved an estimated $1.5 million for every 250 admissions avoided by employing cardiac CTA in the evaluation of patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain, slashing its admission rate for this group from nearly 50 percent to less than 15 percent.

Millard Fillmore Gates Hospital in Buffalo, N.Y., has garnered $762,000 in risk-adjusted annual cost savings by implementing a CT-based stroke triage protocol.

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center has realized reductions in pediatric radiation dose exposure ranging from 10 percent to 80 percent depending on body part imaged and patient age since installing a state-of-the-art CT system.

The common ingredient among these diverse success stories is Toshiba America Medical Systems Aquilion ONE 320 detector row CT system.

Chest pain: The new model

"Imaging reimbursement is definitely declining, and people have asked 'who is going to do imaging anymore.' But we can't look at the value of imaging based on reimbursement. We need to look at the entire picture of what imaging brings to patient management," observes Michael Poon, MD, director of the Advanced Cardiac Imaging Program at Stony Brook University Medical Center.

In the case of chest pain in the ED, CT imaging delivers clear benefits over the standard of care. It provides a clear diagnosis, facilitates shorter lengths of stay and saves money.  

The status quo for chest pain is woeful. Every year, 8 million patients present to the ED, costing more than $18 billion. Yet many, even those admitted to the hospital, are discharged without a clear diagnosis, says Poon. "This standard is not quality care. It's like playing Russian roulette," opines Poon.

Stony Brook developed a new standard of care that is efficient, cost-effective and diagnostic. Since 2009, the center has used Aquilion ONE as the major imaging modality for the evaluation of chest pain in the ED. Patients whose initial biomarkers and enzymes exclude acute coronary syndrome are referred to CT right away.

"The length of stay shortened dramatically from at least 24 hours to less than 10 hours," says Poon. In addition, CT provides a clear-cut diagnosis for the index event and can exclude an acute coronary event, pulmonary emboli and aortic dissection within seconds. The alternatives include mandatory repeat enzyme testing after 8 hours, a labor- and resource-intensive nuclear stress test or observation for patients with suspected high likelihood of disease. "It's very haphazard and does not always produce a definitive diagnosis."  

The ability to accurately diagnose patients using CT is associated with two key benefits. First, with a reassuring result, few patients bounce back into the ED, saving dollars and resources. Plus, hospitals that discharge patients with a diagnosis of chest pain but without a clear-cut final diagnosis are not providing quality care, as chest pain is a symptom not a diagnosis.

"The CT model fits perfectly with the push for quality; it saves money and improves outcomes without adding more layers to the system," Poon says. Comparative effectiveness studies, including CT-STAT, a 750-patient study scheduled for publication in September, show CT is more efficient and cost-effective than nuclear stress testing, echoing the results of